Brendon McCullum loathed the moniker Bazball from its inception, viewing it as overly simplistic and perhaps foreseeing how it might be used as a weapon in the future. Currently, down 2-0 in an Test series in Australia that began with great expectations, it has become the butt of Australian jokes.
However the coach has contributed to the problem either. After the crushing loss at the Gabba, his insistence that, if there was an issue, England were 'too prepared' prior to the day-night Test was akin to trying to put out a bin fire with petrol. It could become his epitaph as national coach if results do not improve.
In a way, one must admire his commitment to the bit. As much as he claims to ignore external noise, he will have been acutely aware of an England team increasingly characterised as carefree and underprepared.
The truth, as always, is more nuanced. England play as much golf during their necessary down time as their rivals and they practice equally hard. Before the Gabba Test, they trained for longer, logging five days to Australia's three, due to their lack of exposure to the pink ball and the changes in lighting conditions.
The coach's point about being "over-prepared" was that those five extra days were his call – the moment he blinked in his belief that less is more. It meant a significant amount of focus was expended before they even took the field in the cauldron of Australia's stronghold. While net practice are a chance to iron out skills, they can also become a safety blanket; zero consequence work that mainly keeps the reactions quick.
Fixtures are tight such that pre-series state games were not possible (with no guarantee, when you consider England having played three before the whitewash in 2013-14). What is harder to square is the disregard of domestic red-ball cricket as a worthwhile exercise in general, evidenced by a young player's wasted summer.
Only playing prepares cricketers for the many situations they walk out to face, and it is in this area where England have thus far fallen well short. The issue is not just with the batting – as poor as some of the shot selection has been – but an bowling attack that seems without a spearhead. None has demonstrated the persistence or control that the exceptional Australian paceman and his teammates have displayed.
McCullum's unconventional outlook was liberating during its initial year, an excellent, apt remedy to shake off the torpor that came before. The frustration now comes in how it has seemingly not evolved past that initial phase – an absence of an second phase to the original software that has seen results taper off to 14 wins and 14 losses from their most recent matches.
One such player is Jamie Smith, a gifted player, undoubtedly, but one who is being mercilessly targeted on each side of the bat and has dropped two crucial opportunities as wicketkeeper. It probably does not help when your opposite number, the Australian keeper, has just produced a virtuoso display.
Based on McCullum's comments after the match, England look likely to keep the faith with Smith in Adelaide. The hope – as is the case – is that a return to a more familiar Test setting unleashes his top form, with Perth's trampoline surface and the unfamiliar day-night format now out of the way.
Another option is to implement the plan discovered during the victorious series in New Zealand last year by moving the batsman down to his more natural home as a active No. 5 or 6, handing him the wicketkeeping duties, and picking a new No 3. Bethell scored runs for the Lions recently, or perhaps Will Jacks could fulfil a comparable function to Moeen Ali in 2023.
Ultimately, none of this is perfect, however Australia's better fundamentals having shattered expectations and pushed the team's entire approach into the spotlight.
A seasoned traveler and writer with a passion for uncovering hidden gems and sharing transformative journeys across continents.